Table of Contents
If you are confused whether to use a RAID 5 or a RAID 10, you might find this article quite useful. But before deciding which configuration to use, here are a few basic principles you need to know.
What is RAID?
Redundant array of independent or inexpensive disks (RAID) is a process of storing information on multiple hard disks to achieve greater protection and performance. A number of storage methods are named levels and they are numbered from 0-9.
What is RAID 5?
RAID 5 uses data striping with parity and this configuration is able to reconstruct data during disk failure. The existing storage is used more efficiently because the data is not mirrored.
At the same time, this setup balances the fault tolerance, performance, security, and storage to achieve an overall efficient configuration. This is why RAID implementation is popular because of this balance.
RAID 5 advantages
- Inexpensive to implement
- Striping offers fast reads
- Provides good balance between fault tolerance, performance, and security
- Offers high efficiency for data storage.
RAID 5 disadvantages
- Rebuilding data takes a long time due to parity
- Slow in write performance
- Implementation is complex
What is RAID 10?
As a complex level, RAID 10 combines the configuration and benefits of RAID 0 and RAID 1. So, the capabilities of both levels are combined to provide both enhanced performance and fault tolerance. Data is then striped evenly across disks in this configuration and these are also mirrored.
RAID 10 advantages
- Improved performance
- Read and write data simultaneously as fast as you can
- Offers excellent security
- No data loss
RAID 10 disadvantages
- Since data is mirrored only 50% of storage capacity can be used
- It needs more disks to implement making it an expensive option
Which is better?
There might be no question as to which RAID level is better in this category. That is because it is more on which of the levels would suit your setup at different scenarios.
However, the most notable difference between RAID 5 and RAID 10 is the way how it rebuilds the data. When a disk fails, there will be no change in your read/write operations. This is so since RAID 10 reads data from the mirror disk, then copies it to the disk you replaced.
On the other hand, a RAID 5 configuration will have to do a time-consuming task that puts a higher load on your system. This is so since the disk reads data from other disks, uses the parity information across the disks, and then reconstructs the data.
Overall, RAID 10 offers excellent fault tolerance and performance, while RAID 5 is more suitable for efficient backup and storage. But that does not mean that RAID 5 doesn’t have a decent level of fault tolerance and performance.
At the same time, RAID 10 is more expensive because it needs more disks, while RAID 5 is more complex to implement. That makes both configurations even, as the right choice will depend entirely on the given scenario, expectations, and cost constraints, among other factors.